161
Objektivi / Odg: 17-50 2.8 Tamron ili Sigma?
« poslato: Februar 17, 2015, 04:09:03 posle podne »
nisam probao nikon 17-55 ali da trenutno imam para uzeo bih ga bez razmisljanja. trnutno bas arcim tamrona i ok mi je. po meni jedan od validnijih test sajtova lenstip.com kaze sledece:
"The results of our test show that Nikkor 17-55 mm is the best lens in its class on the market. It is true that Canon 17-55 is only slightly worse and is additionally equipped with tempting image stabilizer but still Nikkor wins when it comes to optics and mechanics. Every owner of a digital camera with a DX matrix who can afford it, should consider buying this lens very seriously.
Finally, I invite all full frame lovers to compare frame corners of pictures taken with Nikkor 17-55 F/2.8 and D90 or D300 with pictures from Nikkor 24-70 mm f/2.8 and D700, D3 or D3x. Maximum aperture effects can give you a lot to think about."
sda je pitanje razlike u kvalitetu koji daje na novijim senzorima zbog veceg broja pixela,ali verujem da je dostojan tih 500 koliko kosta.
"The results of our test show that Nikkor 17-55 mm is the best lens in its class on the market. It is true that Canon 17-55 is only slightly worse and is additionally equipped with tempting image stabilizer but still Nikkor wins when it comes to optics and mechanics. Every owner of a digital camera with a DX matrix who can afford it, should consider buying this lens very seriously.
Finally, I invite all full frame lovers to compare frame corners of pictures taken with Nikkor 17-55 F/2.8 and D90 or D300 with pictures from Nikkor 24-70 mm f/2.8 and D700, D3 or D3x. Maximum aperture effects can give you a lot to think about."
sda je pitanje razlike u kvalitetu koji daje na novijim senzorima zbog veceg broja pixela,ali verujem da je dostojan tih 500 koliko kosta.